Case — Charitable Contribution Deduction

Thanks for sharing!

TL Case Summ

THE QUESTION

Can an attorney take a tax deduction for case materials donated to a charity?

THE DISPUTE

Taxpayer Says:  Case files relating to the Oklahoma City bombing that were donated to the University of Texas are eligible for a charitable contribution deduction.

Internal Revenue Service Says:  The case files did not belong to the taxpayer (an attorney), making the gift invalid and the deduction not allowable.

THE LAW

From Internal Revenue Code Section 170(a)(1):  There shall be allowed as a deduction any charitable contribution (as defined in subsection (c)) payment of which is made within the taxable year. A charitable contribution shall be allowable as a deduction only if verified under regulations prescribed by the Secretary.

From Internal Revenue Code Section 170(c): Charitable contribution defined – “For purposes of this section, the term “charitable contribution” means a contribution or gift to or for the use of—[list of eligible organizations omitted because there is no dispute as to eligibility of the university as a qualified charitable organization]

From DeJong v. Commissioner, 36 T.C. 896, 899 (1961): As used in Internal Revenue Code Section 170, the term “charitable contribution” is synonymous with the word “gift.” A gift is generally defined as a voluntary transfer of property by the owner to another without consideration therefor.

From Ragan v. Citizens’ State Bank, 131 P. 1093 (Okla. 1913): As a general rule under Oklahoma law, possession of personal property is, if unexplained, prima facie evidence of ownership.

From Rule 1.6 (a) of the Oklahoma Rules of Professional Conduct: A lawyer shall not reveal information relating to representation of a client unless the client consents after consultation, except for disclosures that are impliedly authorized in order to carry out the representation * * *

THE CAUSE OF THE DISPUTE

One of the requirements for making a valid gift under Federal tax law is beneficial legal ownership, but “ownership” is not defined under Federal tax law.

In applying Federal tax law, State law (in this case, Oklahoma) controls in determining the nature of a taxpayer’s legal interest in property. State law creates legal interests, while Federal law determines when and how those interests are taxed. In order to make a valid gift for Federal tax purposes, a transfer must at least effect a valid gift under applicable State law.

Taxpayer believes possession equates to ownership under Oklahoma law. The Internal Revenue Service contends an attorney acts as an agent on behalf of a client, so client records belong to the client and are not the personal property of the attorney.

WHAT WOULD YOU DECIDE?

Make your selection, then see “The Court’s Decision” below for a full explanation

For the or for the

THE COURT’S DECISION

Download (PDF, 30KB)

***

HL Carpenter, an experienced investor and a CPA, specializes in reader friendly articles on taxes and investing for individuals and small businesses, and publishes two newsletters: Taxing Lessons and Top Drawer Ink. Visit TaxingLessons.com and HLCarpenter.com.

This information should not be considered legal, investment or tax advice. Taxing Lessons and Top Drawer Ink Corp. do not provide legal, investment or tax advice. Always consult your legal, investment and/or tax advisor regarding your personal situation.

***

Other posts you might enjoy

Decisions — Taxing choices Image source: Free Picture © Semen Barkovskiy Dreamstime Stock Photos   How many options can you consider before you find yourself longing for simplicity? Whatever your answer, part of the desire for less complexity comes from not wanting to make the wrong choice. That's especially true ...
Decisions — Where’s your refund? Image source: By U.S. National Archives and Records Administration, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons Where's your refund? Possibly helping to reduce the federal budget deficit, if you failed to file a return to get an overpayment back within the applicable time period. That's because the gov...
Case — Fun and games Image source: openclipart.org (public domain image) THE QUESTION Does an organization that offers a recreational activity to achieve a charitable purpose qualify as a charitable organization? THE DISPUTE Taxpayer Says: It operates for charitable purposes because it provides relief for the p...
Case — Carry On THE QUESTION Can an IRA deduction that is disallowed due to active participant status in an employer plan be carried forward and deducted in a future year? THE DISPUTE Taxpayer Says: The 2008 IRA contribution was an “excess contribution” and should be allowable as a deduction in 2010. Intern...
Sorry, wrong answer :(
Right answer!
For the IRS. Though no specific statute was on point, the Court determined from various court cases that under Oklahoma law, property held by an attorney in the scope of representing his client belongs to the client. Since the attorney/taxpayer is not the legal owner of the case materials, he cannot make a valid gift or take a charitable deduction for the donation.
Posted in Taxing Lessons Case Summaries Tagged with: