Taxing Lessons Case Summaries

Case — Gambling Expenses

Thanks for sharing!
3 minute read

TL Case Summ


Can a professional gambler deduct non-wagering related expenses in excess of gambling winnings?


Taxpayer Says: The expenses of carrying on his gambling business (other than direct wagering expenses) are deductible because they are ordinary and necessary business expenses.

Internal Revenue Service Says: The expenses are not deductible because they exceed the receipts from gambling.


From Internal Revenue Code Section 162(a): Generally allows a deduction for “all the ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred during the taxable year in carrying on any trade or business.”

From Internal Revenue Code Section 165(d): Provides that “Losses from wagering transactions shall be allowed only to the extent of the gains from such transactions.”


When you make your living gambling, you can treat your gambling activities as a business. That means you can deduct expenses related to your business. However, the tax code provides a limitation on the amount of losses you can deduct, limiting them to the amount of your gains from gambling. That’s true whether you’re a professional gambler or you gamble as a hobby.

Disputes arise because of the apparent conflict between two code sections, one that allows deductions for business expenses, and one that limits losses for gambling activities, even when those activities are conducted as a business. In addition, the term “loss” is not defined in the code or the regulations, and the distinction between wagering losses and deductible business expenses is not always clear-cut.

In this case, the taxpayer, a professional gambler, deducted various expenses, such as vehicle expenses, meals, entertainment, telephone, and subscriptions, from the income he made gambling. The expenses created a loss, which he deducted from his other income on his personal tax return.

The IRS disallowed the loss, saying deductions related to the taxpayer’s gambling business are limited to gains from that business.


Make your selection, then see “The Court’s Decision” below for a full explanation

For the or for the


Download (PDF, 46KB)


HL Carpenter, an experienced investor and a CPA, specializes in reader friendly articles on taxes and investing for individuals and small businesses, and publishes two newsletters: Taxing Lessons and Top Drawer Ink. Visit and

This information should not be considered legal, investment or tax advice. Taxing Lessons and Top Drawer Ink Corp. do not provide legal, investment or tax advice. Always consult your legal, investment and/or tax advisor regarding your personal situation.


Other posts you might enjoy

Decisions — Taxing choices Image source: Free Picture © Semen Barkovskiy Dreamstime Stock Photos   How many options can you consider before you find yourself longing for simplicity? Whatever your answer, part of the desire for less complexity comes from not wanting to make the wrong choice. That's especially true ...
Decisions — Where’s your refund? Image source: By U.S. National Archives and Records Administration, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons Where's your refund? Possibly helping to reduce the federal budget deficit, if you failed to file a return to get an overpayment back within the applicable time period. That's because the gov...
Case — Fun and games Image source: (public domain image) THE QUESTION Does an organization that offers a recreational activity to achieve a charitable purpose qualify as a charitable organization? THE DISPUTE Taxpayer Says: It operates for charitable purposes because it provides relief for the p...
Case — Carry On THE QUESTION Can an IRA deduction that is disallowed due to active participant status in an employer plan be carried forward and deducted in a future year? THE DISPUTE Taxpayer Says: The 2008 IRA contribution was an “excess contribution” and should be allowable as a deduction in 2010. Intern...
Right answer!
Sorry, wrong answer :(
For the taxpayer. The taxpayer is entitled to deduct under section 162(a) the business expenses claimed in connection with carrying on his gambling business. Editorial Note 1: This decision reverses many previous cases, including Crawford, which was featured in Taxing Lessons on March 27, 2010. Editorial Note 2: This case addressed another issue as well: The taxpayer had deducted wagering losses in excess of wagering gains. The court *did* limit those losses to the amount of wagering gains. For more information about the distinction between losses and deductions, see IRS Chief Counsel Attorney Memorandum, AM2008-013 (Dec. 19, 2008).