Complexity and Tax Planning

Thanks for sharing!
Silhouette of child in front of blackboardImage source: www.wpclipart.com

Whenever a tax planner begins using jargon you don’t understand, you either ask for clarification or you move on to another professional who can explain things more clearly. In Robucci (T.C. Memo. 2011-19), the taxpayer did neither.

Dr. Robucci, a psychiatrist, went to his CPA-attorney-tax planner to find a way to minimize the self-employment tax he paid on income from his practice. The suggestion: Converting his sole proprietorship to two “alphabet” entities, an LLC and a corporation.

To effect the plan, Dr. Robucci formed legal corporations under Colorado law, signed various corporate documents including loans and business and medical reimbursement plans, and transferred some money into a corporate bank account. Then he proceeded to conduct business as usual.

The problem: Business as usual meant the corporations existed as “hollow shells.” The IRS said they served no significant purpose or function other than tax avoidance, and should be disregarded.

The court agreed. Disregarding the corporations put Dr. Robucci back to his tax status as a sole proprietorship, making all his income subject to self-employment tax–the very result he had intended to avoid. In addition, the court said Dr. Robucci had no reasonable cause for relying on his tax advisor and held him liable for accuracy-related penalties.

Even worse, the court stated the plan might have worked, at least in part, had Dr. Robucci’s new corporations created a “meaningful change.” (Despite the IRS position, the court points out that tax law in regard to self-employment taxation of profit distributions to members of professional service LLCs continues to be uncertain.)

Taxing Lesson: In tax, few things are as simple as ABC-123. In the words of the tax court:
“When a taxpayer is presented with what would appear to be a fabulous opportunity to avoid tax obligations, he should recognize that he proceeds at his own peril.”

***

Other posts you might enjoy

Decisions — Canine silence Image source: wpclipart.com   In the Arthur Conan Doyle short story, Silver Blaze, fictional detective Sherlock Holmes solved the case by inferring intent from silence—the significance of a dog who didn't bark. In a tax court case this week (149 T.C. No. 2, Gregory), internal revenue ...
Decisions — Eat, drink, deduct Image source: Theodoor Rombouts , via Wikimedia Commons  Even if you don't eat like a hockey player, you may be interested in the tax court's take on the rules limiting deductions for meals. Under current tax law, meal and entertainment expenses are not deductible unless the expenses are...
Decisions — Worth the whistle Image source: Zephyris, via Wikimedia Commons   A taxpayer thinks his information is worth the whistle. The IRS says the information is not worth the dust which the rude wind blows in the taxpayer's face…or something along those Shakespearean lines. Who's right? In general, tax law pr...
Decisions — Foreseeing anticipation Image source: https://wpclipart.com/   According to Dr. Seuss, sometimes the questions are complicated, and the answers are simple. The good doc probably wasn't referring to tax law, but that doesn't stop tax practitioners from anticipating a simple answer before researching the question...
Posted in Taxing Lessons From Court Decisions Tagged with: