Taxing Lessons From Court Decisions

Decisions — His, hers, theirs … or not

Thanks for sharing!
Image source: Hands Together ID: 238290 Olga Vasilkova, Dreamstime Stock Photos
Image source: Hands Together ID: 238290 Olga Vasilkova, Dreamstime Stock Photos

Filing a joint tax return means you can benefit from tax deductions and credits that may be limited if you’re married but choose to file a return separate from your spouse. But electing to file jointly has a price as well, and the price is joint and several liability, which means you and your spouse are both legally responsible for the tax due on your return. Put another way, the IRS can collect the entire amount due from either of you, even after you divorce or one of you dies. As the old joke goes, taxes on a joint return are not “hers” and “his” but “theirs” – that is, belonging to “THE IRS.”

The tax code does include provisions to provide relief from joint and several liability (section 6015), including what’s commonly called innocent spouse relief.

To qualify for innocent spouse relief, you have to meet three criteria.

1. You filed a joint return that has an understatement of tax that is solely attributable to your spouse’s erroneous item. An erroneous item includes income received by your spouse but omitted from the joint return. Deductions, credits, and property basis are also erroneous items if they are incorrectly reported on the joint return,

2. You establish that at the time you signed the joint return you did not know, and had no reason to know, that there was an understatement of tax, and

3. Taking into account all the facts and circumstances, it would be unfair to hold you liable for the understatement of tax

In Docket Number 12087-10 (Mathewson), the taxpayer married during 2001, and filed a joint return with her spouse for that tax year. The joint return included a large capital loss carryforward from the then-single husband’s prior year. The unused loss was the result of a tax shelter. The IRS took the partnership to court, and eventually the partnership losses were disallowed.

Once the partnership lawsuit was settled, the IRS issued a notice to the taxpayer and her spouse for underpaid tax related to the loss carryforward as well as a 40%
penalty on the underpayment.

The taxpayer said she qualifies for innocent spouse relief because the loss carryforward reported on the joint return came from the year 2000, the tax year before she and her husband married.

Based on the criteria above, do you agree the taxpayer qualifies for innocent spouse relief?

 

WHAT WOULD YOU DECIDE?

Make your selection, then hover your mouse
over the link beneath “The Decision”

or

 

THE DECISION

For a full explanation, hover your mouse over the link

Interested in more decisions involving joint and several liability?

Click here to read the Taxing Lessons write-up of three decisions from 2014.

***

Note: Taxing Lessons provides a summarized version of sometimes lengthy court decisions. The full case may include facts and issues not presented here. Please use the link provided in the post to read the entire case.

This information should not be considered legal, investment or tax advice. Taxing Lessons and Top Drawer Ink Corp. do not provide legal, investment or tax advice. Always consult your legal, investment and/or tax advisor regarding your personal situation.

***

Other posts you might enjoy

Decisions — Going, going, partially gone Image source: Public domain, ©creativecommonsstockphotos ID 83023111 Dreamstime Stock Photos   Morning found us calmly unaware…and then the roof came off and we learned we forgot to file an election with our tax return. That's not exactly how the lyrics of the old rock song go. Howeve...
Decisions — Home A-Gain Image source: openclipart.org   Like the movie franchise, home is where our story begins. But in this case (Forde, Docket No. 1280-16), the thieves owned the home. The taxpayer and his wife purchased the home in 1998 for $835,000. Over the next few years, through 2001, the taxpayer de...
Decisions — Smoking the deductions Image source: ©Melinda Nagy Dreamstime Stock Photos   We're not lost. We just don't know where we are. Words that create a phantom distinction where no difference exists can make us laugh. Except of course when they involve tax law. In T.C. Memo. 2017-211 (Feinberg), the taxpayer w...
Decisions — Point of Interest Image source: wpclipart.com   What's the point? In 149 T.C. No. 17 (CreditGuard of America, Inc.), the court answers the question of at what point a corporation has to start paying interest on a tax liability. The taxpayer, a credit counseling organization, was incorporated in Flor...
Sorry, wrong answer :(
Right answer!

No, the taxpayer does not qualify for innocent spouse relief.

The taxpayer argues that whether she knew or had reason to know of her husband’s understatement is irrelevant because the loss carryforward was attributable to the 2000 tax year, before they were married.

We can assume that’s true — but the standard in section 6015(b) is whether the spouse requesting relief knew or had reason to know of an understatement of tax. (Internal revenue code section 6015(b)(1)(C).)

Tagged