Taxing Lessons From Court Decisions

Decisions — Policing the assets

Thanks for sharing!
Image source: Creativecommonsstockphotos Dreamstime Stock Photos

 

When is an asset not an asset? Or, more precisely, what is an asset when a specific internal revenue code section doesn’t contain a definition?

Typically, when a lender says you don’t have to repay a loan for which you are personally liable, the “forgiveness” of the debt is treated as taxable income to you. As you might expect, “typically” does not mean “always” and internal revenue code section 108 contains several exclusions from the general rule.

One exclusion is insolvency. Section 108 defines insolvency as the excess of liabilities over the fair market value of assets. However, section 108 does not define the terms “assets” and “liabilities.”

In T.C. Memo 2017-32 (Schieber), the question was whether a taxpayer’s pension should be considered an asset when determining whether the taxpayer was insolvent.

A lender cancelled $448,671 of debt that was secured by property owned by the taxpayer. The taxpayer, a retired police officer, reported only part of the cancelled debt as income on his 2009 federal income tax return. He said he was insolvent because at the time the debt was forgiven, his liabilities exceeded his assets, and the portion he did not report was excludable from his income. He did not include the pension he had been receiving since his retirement in 2005 as part of his assets.

The IRS said the taxpayer was not insolvent at the time the debt was forgiven because the taxpayer had the right to receive monthly payments from the pension. That meant the taxpayer could use the monthly payments to pay liabilities, and the pension should be considered an asset.

The taxpayer says the pension is not an asset because he was entitled only to monthly payments under the pension plan and could not convert his interest in the plan to a lump-sum cash amount, sell the interest, assign the interest, borrow against the interest, or borrow from the plan.

The taxpayer and the IRS agree that if the pension is not considered an asset, the taxpayer was not insolvent at the time of the debt cancellation, and the entire amount of the cancelled debt would be taxable.

Here’s the relevant tax law.

From internal revenue code section 108(d)(3): Provides that a taxpayer is insolvent if, immediately before the cancellation of debt, the taxpayer’s liabilities exceeded the fair market value of the taxpayer’s assets. The word “assets” is not defined by the internal revenue code. In Carlson v. Commissioner, a 2001 tax court case, the court said that an asset exempt from creditors could still be an asset under section 108(d)(3) because even an asset exempt from creditors can give the taxpayer “the ability to pay an immediate tax on income” from the canceled debt.

 

WHAT WOULD YOU DECIDE?

Make your selection, then hover your mouse
over the link beneath “The Decision”

or

 

THE DECISION

For a full explanation, hover your mouse over the link

***

Note: Taxing Lessons provides a summarized version of sometimes lengthy court decisions. The full case may include facts and issues not presented here. Please use the link provided in the post to read the entire case.

This information should not be considered legal, investment, or tax advice. Taxing Lessons and Top Drawer Ink Corp. do not provide legal, investment, or tax advice. Always consult your legal, investment, and/or tax advisor regarding your personal situation.

***

Other posts you might enjoy

Decisions — Traveling with taxes Image source: wpclipart.com   Not all who wander are lost, but sometimes their tax deductions are. 1. In Docket #5409-17S (Pulsipher), the taxpayer was a professional artist. He worked in fashion, as a musician, and in set design. In 2015, he was employed on production sets, winding...
Decisions — Guarding the deductions   Image source: wpclipart.com   Ah, the life of a bodyguard. Long boring hours. Annoying clients. Moments of sheer terror. And tax deductions. In T.C. Summary Opinion 2018-7 (Colbert), the taxpayer was a bodyguard for Hollywood celebrities. He worked from home and traveled dai...
Decisions — Springing for repairs Image source: ©publicdomainphotographs Dreamstime Stock Photos   We had a kettle, we let it leak…According to the poem by Rudyard Kipling, having a kettle and letting it leak without repair made the problem worse. In this week's Taxing Lesson, the taxpayer made the repair and still has a...
Decisions — Rejecting the boilerplate Image source: wpclipart.com   The whistleblower wanted a share of the $37.5 million the IRS collected. The IRS gave him boilerplate instead. In Kasper (150 T.C. No. 2), the taxpayer told the IRS that his former employer failed to pay overtime wages to employees and therefore didn't wi...
Right answer!
Sorry, wrong answer :(

For the taxpayer.

The IRS contends the taxpayer’s interest in the pension plan should be considered an asset because the taxpayer can use the monthly payments to pay liabilities. But the test in Carlson v. Commissioner is whether the asset gives the taxpayer the ability to pay an “immediate tax on income” from the canceled debt–not to pay the tax gradually over time.

The taxpayer’s interest in the pension plan cannot be used to immediately pay the income tax on canceled debt income. Therefore, we hold that the taxpayer’s interest in the pension plan is not an asset within the meaning of section 108(d)(3).

Tagged , , ,