Decisions — Reversals and Updates

Thanks for sharing!
Image source: openclipart.org

Image source: openclipart.org

Back in November 2011, Taxing Lessons featured the City Wide Transit tax court decision (T.C. Memo. 2011-279). In that case, the question was whether the usual three year statute of limitations applied in a situation where the taxpayer’s accountant filed fraudulent returns to cover his embezzlement of payroll taxes. The court decided for the taxpayer and barred the IRS from collecting the taxes beyond the three year period.

In March 2013, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed the tax court decision. The Court of Appeals decided that by filing the fraudulent returns, the accountant for City Wide Transit had intentionally evaded taxes. Since fraud extends the statute of limitations, the IRS could collect the prior year taxes beyond the usual three year limit.

In October 2013, in a similar case (BASR Partnership), the US Court of Federal Claims found the extended statute of limitations did not apply based on fraudulent intent by the tax return preparer. Instead, the court said that extending the statute beyond the usual three year period required fraudulent intent by the taxpayer.

Though the situation and facts in BASR differed from those in City Wide Transit, the underlying question of interpreting whose fraudulent intent extends the statute of limitation remains. Is the three year statute extended only when the taxpayer commits fraud? Or does fraud by a preparer or other agent of the taxpayer also extend the statute?

The IRS can appeal BASR once more, to the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, so the end of this particular story has yet to be written.

***

HL Carpenter, an experienced investor and a CPA, specializes in reader friendly articles on taxes and investing for individuals and small businesses, and publishes two newsletters: Taxing Lessons and Top Drawer Ink. Visit TaxingLessons.com and HLCarpenter.com.

This information should not be considered legal, investment or tax advice. Taxing Lessons and Top Drawer Ink Corp. do not provide legal, investment or tax advice. Always consult your legal, investment and/or tax advisor regarding your personal situation.

***

Other posts you might enjoy

Decisions — Exceptional gifting Image source: Internet Archive Book Images , via Wikimedia Commons It's not how much you give that counts, unless of course you're giving more than the annual gift tax exemption amount. In that case, the amount does matter, and you need to file a gift tax return. In Office of Chief Counsel Me...
Decisions — The gift of reading Image source: Romi, Public Domain image via Pixabay.com To paraphrase Mark Twain, be careful when reading the tax code. While a misprint won't necessarily cause death, misinterpreting the wording can cause a fair amount of grief, including an extended time for the assessment of tax, penalties, a...
Decisions — Virgin Territory Image source: Lestatb (Own work) , via Wikimedia Commons In the realm of tax law, the statute of limitations is not new territory. You know the general rule: the statue of limitations for assessment of taxes expires three years from the due date of the return or the date filed, whichever is later ...
Decisions — Cutting off the Deadline Image source: ISwaggMaster123 (Own work) via Wikimedia Commons In the days of the American Civil War, deadlines had consequences--prisoners were shot on sight if they crossed a marked boundary known as the "deadline." The effect of deadlines in tax law is generally less serious, and can often be...
Posted in Taxing Lessons From Court Decisions Tagged with: