Definition — Fines and Penalties

Thanks for sharing!
Source Dreamstime Stock Photos Free Picture: Case Of Money ID: 219116 © Liz Van Steenburgh

Source Dreamstime Stock Photos Free Picture: Case Of Money ID: 219116 © Liz Van Steenburgh

Internal revenue code section 162 starts out with a general rule of allowing a deduction for all the ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred during the taxable year in carrying on any trade or business.

But when the business expenses are fines and penalties paid to a government for the violation of any law, the general rule no longer applies. Those expenses are not deductible (section 162(f)).

What is a “fine” or “penalty”? Treasury regulation 1.162-2 says fines and penalties include amounts “paid as a civil penalty imposed by federal, state, or local law” and amounts “paid in settlement of actual or potential liability for a fine or penalty (civil or criminal).” However, “compensatory damages…paid to a government do not constitute a fine or penalty.”

“Government” includes the government of the United States, a state, a territory or possession of the United States, the District of Columbia, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and foreign governments, as well as a political subdivision of, or corporation or other entity serving as an agency or instrumentality of, any of the above.

So, break the law, civilly or criminally, intentionally or not, in the US or abroad, and you get no business deduction for fines and penalties you pay for doing so.

Maybe.

Here are three cases involving fines and penalties. Are they deductible or not?

1. In 2006, aerospace company Boeing agreed to pay a $615 million settlement to the US government for violations of federal ethics laws. The settlement included a $565 million civil settlement and a $50 million monetary penalty under a separate criminal agreement.

Do you think the civil settlement was a or a ?

2. On January 18, 2000, Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. entered into a settlement agreement with the US government resolving claims of Medicare fraud. Fresenius agreed to pay $101,186,898 pursuant to the criminal agreements and $385,147,334 pursuant to the civil agreements.

Fresenius claimed tax deductions for the $385,147,334, saying the payment was compensatory (to repay the government for losses).

The IRS said $192,550,517 of the civil settlement payment was properly deductible, but that $126,796,262 of the amount was punitive, and not deductible.

The settlement agreement didn’t specify the nature of the payments and the case went to jury trial.

Do you think the jury said the payment was a  or a ?

3. In 2010, financial firm Goldman Sachs reached a $550 million settlement with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. The penalty was assessed because the SEC said Goldman misled investors in a subprime mortgage product (Goldman did not admit or deny the allegations). Of the $550 million, $250 million was returned to harmed investors and $300 million was paid to the US Treasury.

Do you think the settlement was a or a ?

And here’s the case that brought up the topic: 143 T.C. No. 1 (Guardian Industries Corp.),

In this case, the taxpayer did not dispute that $30,260,000 paid to the Commission of the European Community was a “fine or similar penalty” or that the payment was made “for the violation of * * * [a] law.”

Instead, the taxpayer raised another question: What is a government?

The taxpayer argued the IRS was wrong to disallow a deduction for the payment, which was assessed for price fixing, because the Commission of the European Community was not a government.

The IRS agreed that the Commission is neither “the government of a foreign country” nor “a political subdivision” of the government of a foreign country. However, the IRS said the Commission is an “entity serving as an agency or instrumentality” of the government of a foreign country.

The tax court sided with the IRS, describing the Commission as the executive branch of the European Community (now known as the European Union), tasked with enforcing rules governing competition and free trade.

***

Other posts you might enjoy

Definitions — Curtailing the number Image source: openclipart.org   Voluntary truncation hardly sounds like an enjoyable pastime. But cutting off part of taxpayer identification numbers may be a way to reduce identity theft. Back in 1936, when the Social Security Board created the nine-digit social security number to id...
Definitions — Not so strictly confidential Image source: Public domain via Wikimedia Commons   You've probably heard the old joke about life's two rules. The first one is to never give out all the information. That's a rule the IRS follows and most of the time you're probably happy they do. But for identity theft victims, the ...
Definitions — Paying the piper Image source: Edmund Evans, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons   Whether you believe the expression comes from the Pied Piper of legend or the old proverb, paying the piper does not always mean you get to call the tune. Sometimes the one who makes the rules gets to choose the music. Th...
Definition — Fun with statistics Image source: openclipart.org Keep calm, it's only statistics, and according to author Rex Stout, there are only two kinds – the kind you make up and the kind you look up. The IRS generates statistics (presumably of the second kind) at a heady pace, and the Spring 2017 Statistics of Income Bulle...
Sorry, wrong answer :(
Right answer!

$50 million of the settlement represented a penalty to resolve criminal charges and was not deductible. The $565 million could be classified as compensatory damages that were tax deductible.

Boeing voluntarily did not take the deduction.

Sorry, wrong answer :(
Right answer!

The jury returned a verdict in favor of Fresenius, finding that $95,000,000 of the disputed settlement payments was compensatory and deductible as an ordinary and necessary business expense.

Sorry, wrong answer :(
Right answer!

The settlement could be classified as compensatory damages that were tax deductible.

However, the agreement with the SEC stipulated that Goldman would not “claim, assert or apply for a tax deduction” for any penalty amounts.

Posted in Taxing Definitions Tagged with: ,