Taxing Lessons From Court Decisions

SALY and JLLY

Thanks for sharing!
Image source: http://commons.wikimedia.orgImage source: http://commons.wikimedia.org

The acronyms sound like characters in a kid’s story, or a recipe for some sweet treat. In practice, they’re accounting shorthand for Same As Last Year and Just Like Last Year, both terms that mean the same thing–we’re doing it this way because this is the way we did it before.

One problem: SALY and JLLY are an excuse for not changing. Just because “we’ve always done it that way” doesn’t mean it’s always been done right, or that the method can never be changed.

SALY and JLLY can cause problems when you’re working with tax returns, too. That’s because taxes are calculated using an annual accounting system. While you’re not required to forget what happened in prior years–and should not–each tax year stands on its own and must be separately considered. The IRS is not bound in any given year to allow a deduction permitted for a prior year.

In T.C. Memo. 2012-200 (Saunders), the taxpayer relied on the fact that he’d deducted in prior years–with no questions from the IRS–commuting expenses incurred while driving from his home to a series of temporary workplaces.

Unfortunately, the expenses met none of the exceptions to the general rule that commuting expenses are nondeductible. Despite the allowance of the deductions on prior year returns, the IRS was not required to accept them during the year in question (2007).

The result: Disallowance of $23,121 of unreimbursed expenses.

Taxing Lesson: There is nothing wrong with change, if it is in the right direction.

***

Other posts you might enjoy

Decisions — Time to raise the bar Image source: openclipart.org   The statute of limitations can bar a claim for refund. What happens if that means the government is going to collect tax twice for the same event? In T.C. Memo. 2018-55 (Emery Celli Cuti Brinckerhoff & Abady, P.C.), the taxpayer, a law firm, mistake...
Decisions — Adjusting the interest Image source: openclipart.org   When a CPA deducted interest on a rental mortgage, was he being reasonable? In Wahlin (Docket #23108-16S), the taxpayer, a certified public accountant, owned three rentals. When he purchased them in 2005, he took out three adjustable rate notes with a b...
Decisions — Rejecting the boilerplate Image source: wpclipart.com   The whistleblower wanted a share of the $37.5 million the IRS collected. The IRS gave him boilerplate instead. In Kasper (150 T.C. No. 2), the taxpayer told the IRS that his former employer failed to pay overtime wages to employees and therefore didn't wi...
Decisions — Dueling rules Image source: wpclipart.com   En garde! When provisions in the internal revenue code appear to conflict, taxpayers and the IRS face off in court. Here are two cases from this week involving disputes over dueling code sections. 1. In Docket No. 2103-17S (Palsgaard), the dueling internal...
Tagged